Issue No.160
Newsletter of the American Forum for Global Education
2000

 

 

   

DIRECTIONS: Use the following statements as an introductory questionnaire. Ask students if they agree or disagree and to give reasons for their views. The questionnaire may be used again to measure changes in views at the conclusion of your instruction about the W70. It may also be used to survey the views of others, as discussion or debate topics, or as topics for further research.

  1. Nations that trade with each other do not go to war with each other.
  2. Every nation has some advantages in trading with other nations.
  3. In world trade, competition is superior to cooperation.
  4. Material self-interest is the strongest motivator for individuals and nations.
  5. People have to act collectively to further their well-being.
  6. Interdependence is better than independence.
  7. World trade will strengthen democracy.
  8. Economic development is more powerful than civic values.
  9. Trade creates more jobs and higher standards of living.
  10. Multinational corporations have become more powerful than nations.
  11. Trade with few or no restrictions would be best for everyone.
  12. What is good for multinational corporations is good for individuals.
  13. Sweatshops in poorer nations should not be a concern of the US since this country developed that way.
  14. An international organization should regulate trade among nations.  
  15. Globalization is inevitable.


Use the following questions for discussion starters or after a lesson on the World Trade Organization. With some modifications, these may also be used as topics for debate or research. Alternately, have students represent individual countries or special-interest groups and respond or discuss these issues from that perspective.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

  1. What purposes are served by trade? Should there be any regulations governing trade? Who should regulate trade among nations?
  2. Should trade between nations be taxed? Should there be free trade (no tax or restrictions) among nations? Who would free trade help or hurt? Would free trade raise living standards for all?
  3. Do highly developed nations "owe" anything to poorer nations?
  4. How should decisions be made regarding trade among nations? How should trade be regulated? What should be done about nations that do not follow these regulations?
  5. Should trade decisions be connected to a country’s laws having to do with workers' rights and labor unions? With protecting the environment? With using children as workers?
  6. If many nations agree on laws regulating the environment, or child labor, or workers' rights, should they restrict trade with other nations that do not agree to the same laws?
  7. Who benefits most from "free trade" among nations-governments, large corporations, average citizens.
  8. Do scientific and technological exchanges between nations improve the standard of living for people? Do cultural exchanges, such as television programs, films, publications, sports/entertainment/educational representatives improve the standard of living?
  9. Which of the following, if any, should be controlled by international agreements or laws:
  • Pollution (air, water, land, noise)
  • War crimes (deliberate killing of civilians)
  • Human rights (women, minority, others)
  • Trade
  • Drug trafficking
  • Child labor
  • Worker rights (join a union)
  • Money laundering
  • Chemical or biological weapons
  • Endangered species
  • Illegal immigration
  • Genetically engineered food
  • Smuggling
  • Movement of refugees
  • Patents and copyrights
  • Terrorism
  • Crimes against human beings
  • Land mines
  • Nuclear weapons

Write a statement indicating why some situations should be regulated by international agreements and explain how and why you think this should be done.

  1. Should the WTO include more economic and social policies in its deliberations and decisions?


DIRECTIONS: Give students the statements having to do with the admission of China into the WTO. Have them read this information as well as conduct further research. Have each student write a brief response favoring or opposing the admission of China into the WTO. Then form groups including members with both opinions-those who favor and those who oppose China-to discuss and, if possible, reach agreement. Conduct a class discussion as if it were the US Congress debating and deciding this issue.

An alternative approach would be to assign students to represent the US Department of State, a business group, or a labor group, to respond to this question.

Debriefing questions might include: Should China be admitted to the WTO? Who benefits if China is admitted to the WTO? Who is harmed? If admitted, how will conditions in China change? Will the WTO change? Is it in the US national interest to support, or oppose, admitting China?

Briefing: The People's Republic of China is the largest country in the world. Its economy is the fourth largest in the world and for the past several years it has been seeking admission into the WTO. As a member China would again credibility as a trading nation and gain greater access to international marketplaces.

To become a WTO member, China has to make separate trade agreements with the major trading powers-the United States, Japan, and the European Union. Agreement was reached with the US in 1999 but still needs approval by the US Congress. Without doubt, this will be a controversial issue; debate will focus on concerns over a rising trade deficit, national security, transfer of sensitive technology, the question of Taiwan, the occupation of Tibet, suppression of labor rights and human rights issues.

 

OPINION: CHINA SHOULD BE ADMITTED

China's emergence as a trade power is significant to the US and the world. Only six nations do not have normal trade relations with the US-Afghanistan, Cuba, Laos, North Korea, Serbia-Montenegro, and Vietnam. It is in the interest of the United States to see China join the WTO. How we engage China will determine whether it becomes fully integrated into the global economy and begins to accept international norms and institutions. The alternative is isolated and unpredictable behavior.

Having China in the WTO means having that country participate in a rules-based trading system. To meet WTO requirements, China must make laws public, require judicial review of all trade actions, apply all trade laws uniformly, and submit to WTO dispute settlement to ensure compliance with WTO rules.

China’s membership in the WTO will open its market to other countries for the sale of more goods and services. China will have to lower tariffs, eliminate quotas and other barriers, and allow greater access to its consumers. Membership will mean more US goods and services will be sold in one of the world's fastest growing economies. For nearly every product or service we offer, there is a supplier in Europe or Asia that could also provide that product or service. We should not lose this opportunity to our competitors.

Trade will mean change in China. China's economic ties with the US have been a key part of China’s turn toward the market economy and away from self-isolation. This has brought massive social reform and economic advance for China’s people. Cutting US economic ties would turn the clock back in China, strengthening repressive political interests. Economic reform and development force a society to become more politically and culturally open. Membership in the WTO will give China an incentive to keep its word and maintain the rule of law.

US business contributes to progressive change in China. US firms bring to China ideas, work styles, management methods, adherence to market economies, commitment to the free flow of information, dedication to environmental responsibility and worker safety, and other American ways of doing business.

The US can have trade relations with China and still have fundamental disagreements with China on specific issues. But that doesn't mean that we have to give up our principles.

 

OPINION: CHINA SHOULD NOT BE ADMITTED

Membership in WTO would constitute an undeserved stamp of approval for China's dismal record on human rights, its weapons proliferation and trade in nuclear technology, and its chronic violations of trade agreements.

China’s record over many years demonstrates that it cannot be trusted to honor its trade agreements. There is concern about China’s compliance with the agreements that have been made by China, for example the 1992 agreement on intellectual property rights. China did not keep its word and the US has threatened sanctions.

China’s human rights violations have increased even as it has begun to open its economy. In 1998 dozens of Chinese were arrested attempting to form a political party. Leaders of the China Democracy Party were sentenced to lengthy jail terms in closed trials that violated due process. Forced labor remains a serious problem and China continues to export prison-made goods, despite an official ban. There have been recent crackdowns on religious freedom, a campaign to suppress the Falun Gong, control on "unregistered" churches, and repression of political and religious expression of ethnic minorities such as the people of Tibet. Amnesty International reports that more people are executed every year in China than in all other countries of the world combined.

Large corporations and special interests say that the US should keep the issues of trade and human rights with China separate, but they are related. Increased market access for Chinese products enriches the oppressive government and strengthens its political hold over the country. Profit from trade and investment benefits the Communist system and much of that money is used to upgrade their military facilities and invest in their control of the population.

Chinese weapons proliferation should not be rewarded with the political plum of WTO membership. China's espionage and trade in arms threatens American and international security. Much evidence points to Chinese spying and theft of nuclear secrets at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. US intelligence sources report that China has shipped specialized equipment to Pakistan for making nuclear weapons. China has also provided anti-ship cruise missiles and parts for Iran.


Source: Adapted from WTO Trade Winds Project, "China and the WTO. " World Affairs Council (World Trade Center 2200 Alaskan Way, Suite 450, Seattle, WA 98121).